Dan on 4 Feb 2002 17:15:08 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
spoon-business: Judgement on CFJ 340 |
Judgement on CFJ 340 by Bean Judge: Dan Defendant: Scoff Statement: The Players Antonio, Baron von Skippy, Congenital Optimist, Dan, Glotmorpf, Iain, Rob, The Voice, Uncle Psychosis, Wonko did not resign. Ruling: TRUE Judge's Analysis: Rule 14/0 states "A Player may forfeit at any time by publicly declaring eir intention to do so. No restrictions may be placed on when a Player may forfeit." I am interpreting "resign" as equivalent to "forfeit" since that is clearly what was intended by the CFJ. The following are the attempted actions posted to the public forum by Scoff {{ Antonio forfeits B Nomic Baron von Skippy forfeits B Nomic Bean forfeits B Nomic Congenital Optimist forfeits B Nomic Dan forfeits B Nomic Glotmorf forfeits B Nomic Iain forfeits B Nomic Rob forfeits B Nomic The Voice forfeits B Nomic Turgul forfeits B Nomic Uncle Psychosis forfeits B Nomic Wonko forfeits B Nomic }} Rule 14 regulates forfeiture and therefore it may not be done except as allowed in the rules. The Administrator never recognized the action, and I claim precedent to game custom that actions ignored by the Administrator do not happen unless a CFJ is made to correct the Administrator's error. Finally I should point out that the nature of forfeiture is not specified in the rules. Therefore there is nothing to prevent a forfeited player from being chosen as a Judge. This Judgement asserts its own legitimacy. Dan