Jonathan Van Matre on 14 Jan 2002 18:08:51 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
spoon-business: Proposal: Bandwidth Limiting That Works? |
__Verbosity Sux!__ {{ Repeal rule 212. Then, create a new rule as follows: {{ __All the Proposals You Want, but Keep It Simple__ All players are limited to 6000 non-whitespace characters per ballot. A players may submit as many proposals as e wishes, providing the collective text of the player's proposals on the ballot (including comments) does not exceed 6000 non-whitespace characters. This limit applies regardless of the nweek in which the proposal was submitted for the ballot. In the event that a player exceeds the limit, eir proposals shall be accepted or rejected in the order submitted. Any proposal that would cause the player to exceed the limit will be rejected by the Administrator. If a player submits a revision of a previously-submitted proposal that would push the player over the limit, the Administrator will reject that revision. }} [[I welcome input from the Administrator on how this might be implemented, or if it's impossible. There are any number of freeware/shareware/bloatware editing programs that count non-whitespace text (e.g. MS Word, UltraEdit). But the most elegant solution might be to make all proposal submissions via a web page that would automatically count the characters and automatically notify the player whether it was accepted or rejected. Saves everyone having to find their own method of counting. Anyway, the rationale should be pretty plain. Discourage the practice (exacerbated by the current 3-prop limit) of making big bloated single proposals like my own 236, while still placing some kind of enforceable limit on the amount of text we can be subjected to per nweek. 6000 characters should work out to roughly 800 to 1000 words, depending on your preferred vocabulary. Seems a reasonable limit to me, and that's despite the fact that 236 alone was over 8000 non-whitespace characters.]] }}