Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: CFJ - Just to be difficult

[ID Scott <Iain.Scott.01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

21 of my imaginary friends (names withheld for privacy and spam
protection) vote NO to proposals 202/0, 221/2 and 226/0.

cheers,
Iain  

On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Donald Whytock wrote:

> On 1/13/02 at 11:18 PM ID Scott wrote:
> 
> >Statement:
> >The rules do not require the entity which casts votes to be a player,
> >and hence the votes submitted by Glortmorfs imaginary friends (and,
> >for that matter, Wonkos friends) are valid, and should be taken in to
> >account when the administrator tallies the votes and determines the
> >passage or failure of the proposals in the cuurent ballot.
> >
> >cheers,
> >Iain
> 
> Difficult doesn't even scratch the surface, lad.  I at least was
> prepared to provide turing-test question responses for my imaginary
> friends.  But if a voter doesn't have to be a player, a voter doesn't
>have to pass a turing test either, or have the email address that
> Our Admin was requiring; therefore one could have: "50,000 of my
>imaginary friends (names withheld for purposes of confidentiality and
>spam prevention) all vote Yes to my proposal."
> 
> 						Glotmorf
> 
> 
>