David E. Smith on 13 Jan 2002 15:24:39 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spoon-business: CFJ -- invalid proposals 

On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Donald Whytock wrote:

> Proposals 229, 230, 231, 240, 241 and 242 are not valid proposals
> because they do not use the Standard Delimiters listed in Rule 217.

I assume the above is your Statement for a CFJ?

In that case, this CFJ 248, assigned to The Voice.

...dave