|David E. Smith on 27 Jun 2001 16:18:20 -0000|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|spoon-business: RFJ 49 Judgment|
There may be a few little quirks in the terminology, as the nomic.net Web server is down again. Nevertheless, here cometh the ruling... (begin ruling) Statement: The judgement on RFJ 47 is invalid because the selection of The Kid as Judge violated Rule 236/1. Plaintiff's Analysis: >Rule 236/1 states: >"The following are excluded from serving as Judges on a Request for Judgment: > > 1. the Plaintiff > 2. Judges previously recused from the Request > 3. any one Player that the Plantiff requests be recused from the Request > >The Kid made the Request for Judgement on May 10, 2001, and since there is >more than one Player in the game, he can never be selected as Judge. Not >every eligible Player was selected, in addition, the previously recused >Judges must be selected again to judge before he can be considered. Ruling: TRUE Judge's Analysis: What the plaintiff said. Judicial Orders: I order that RFJ 47 be re-assigned to an eligible judge and that the previous ruling be discarded. Alternately, an identical RFJ may be opened with a new number, at the discretion of the judiciary. (The former option makes a bit more sense, but the latter may be easier to track in the database.) Either way, said RFJ may not be assigned to: The Kid (as the caller for the RFJ); any one party selected by The Kid at eir discretion (per Rule 236/1, should e choose to invoke it); Aranor (previously recused from judgment); PurpleBob (for conflict-of-interest reasons). (end ruling) The tribe has spoken. ...dave ---- David E. Smith, POB 515045, St. Louis MO 63151 http://www.technopagan.org/ dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.bureau42.com/ http://metadave.net/ I used to drive a Heisenbergmobile, but every time I looked at the speedometer, I got lost.