|David E. Smith on 19 Jun 2001 04:24:57 -0000|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|spoon-business: RFJ on the most recent ballot|
I request an RFJ on this statement: "The player known as Dave, as of one second past the end of nweek 26, owns three Rules." Plaintiff's analysis: Proposal 471/1 transferred ownership of all Rules to the Bank. So, this would seem to be a nice simple "FALSE" ruling, right? But. (You knew that one was coming, didn't you.) I cannot find any reference in the current Rules that defines the order or timing of how Rules come into existence. I posit that all passed proposals take effect simultaneously; therefore, the three Rules which I would own as a result of Proposal 469/0 passing are in fact mine, and not included in the effects of 471. This also means that PurpleBob owns 1 rule and Joerg owns 12 or so rules (I lost count somewhere in the middle of wading through P467/2), all per Rule 326/0. Since it affects that player so heavily, under Rule 236/1 I request that Joerg NOT be assigned this RFJ. Have a nice day. ...dave ---- David E. Smith, POB 515045, St. Louis MO 63151 http://www.technopagan.org/ dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.bureau42.com/ http://metadave.net/ I used to drive a Heisenbergmobile, but every time I looked at the speedometer, I got lost.