Re: spoon-business: RFJ

[Antonio <zagarna@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 6 Apr 2001 09:30:15 +0100 , "Harrison, Andrew"
<andy.harrison@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote :

>Sorry about this Poulenc, but cos of RFJ#44 I think this should be done too.
>
>I propose the following RFJ:
>
>Statement:
>Poulenc's placing of a stone on K5 on 30th March is invalid as he had
>already made a move on that day. The stone should be removed and Poulenc
>refunded his 4 points.
>The alliance that Benjamin offered to Jeff on 3rd April is invalid as he had
>already made a move on that day. The alliance should be canceled. (The
>re-offer of the alliance earlier today still stands.)
>The alliance that The Kid offered to various people on 3rd April is invalid
>as he had already made a move on that day. The alliance with Chess should be
>canceled
>
>Analysis:
>This is to bring the game into alignment with RFJ#44.
>
>Note to Judge:
>You'll need to make a judicial order to remove the stone and cancel the
>alliences. However be careful that you don't cancel any alliance that is
>made between now and your verdict. I don't know what can happen with K5 in
>the mean time. I don't think anyone can place a stone there till your
>verdict as technically Poulencs stone is still there.


Recognized as RFJ number 45 and assigned to player Joerg 
-- 

zagarna

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com