RE: spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: Motion to Amend Trivialy

[Dan <wald7330@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Yeah, I going to object. Sorry Poulenc but to me that doesn't seem a trivial
> change. To me a trivial change must be simple enough that I can just read it
> and be happy that it doesn't really change anything substantial. With a
> global replacement like that I'd have to search through the rules and check
> each place, and I don't have the time for that. Although I'm fairly sure
> that there wouldn't be any problem with this particular change, I'd rather
> we didn't allow global changes as they are so easy to get wrong.

Would it be all right then if I make another motion to do the replacement
within a specified list of rules?

Poulenc