|Joel Uckelman on 22 Dec 2000 04:20:42 -0000|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|spoon-business: P371 revision|
I just finished putting up the pages for Motions. In doing so, I noticed that there were a few that have been around for a while, but can only pass by unanimous consent. Also, there's the Motion to Add Feyd as a Player which got lost in the end-of-semester craziness. (Sorry this is taking so long, Feyd!) So, I'm addressing these in a revised version of P371: 1. Amend R230/3 to read as follows: "An Agent introducing a Approvable Motion may request unanimous consent at the time of its introduction, or until such time as the granting of unanimous consent could still occur prior to the nweek's voting, unless the Rules explicitly prohibit it. N-unanimous consent on a Motion is granted if no eligible voters object to the Motion within time N after the Motion is recognized. Unanimous consent is considered to have been requested for any Approvable Motions which may be adopted only by unanimous consent." 2. Create a new Rule entitled "Motion Duplication" which reads: "The recognition by any Officer of any Motion which would have the same effect another live Motion is prohibited." 3. Motions 6/0, 7/0, and 8/0 are considered to have received unanimous consent as of the passage of this Proposal. -- J.