spoon-business: Recinding Proposal

["Harrison, Andrew" <andy.harrison@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hey, guess what. I just noticed Rule 118. Don't I feel stupid! So I recind
the proposal that I made below. As it hasn't been recognised yet, I can do
this by the new rule created by prop 311. I'm assuming that this is
different from just withdrawing it?

--
The Kid

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harrison, Andrew [mailto:andy.harrison@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 10 October 2000 14:03
> To: 'Nomic Business'
> Subject: RE: spoon-business: ballot
> 
> 
> > From: Joel Uckelman [mailto:uckelman@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > 
> > 
> > Voting began at 00:00:00, 10 October 2000, and will last 
> > until 00:00:00, 13 
> > October 2000.
> 
> <snip!>
> 
> Rule 224/0 states:
> "Each eligible voter may cast one vote on each Ballot Issue."
> 
> Where exactly does it define 'eligible voter'? 
> 
> In Rule 226/0 is says:
> "A Player may vote privately..."
> So we know that a Player may vote privately, and I suppose we 
> can assume
> from this that a Player may also vote publicly, but this is 
> not stated.
> 
> However Rule 231/0 says:
> "...each Agent who voted..."
> So this implies that eligible voters are not necessarily restricted to
> Players. Are there any other Agents that can vote? I suspect 
> not, but maybe
> the rules should make it clear.
> 
> So here is a simple proposal for a new rule:
> 
> 	Proposal: Eligible Voters
> 	The following entities are Eligible Voters:
> 	Players, as defined in Rule 106.
> 
> I've put it as a list so that if we want to add to it at any 
> time it should
> be quite easy. If I've completely missed something obvious 
> that already
> defines Eligible Voters, then let me know and I'll withdraw 
> this proposal.
> 
> BTW, is it ok for me to submit this proposal before the start 
> of the next
> nweek?
> 
> --
> The Kid
>