Tom Plagge on 9 Oct 2000 15:58:38 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
spoon-business: RFJ 12/0 |
Statement: An agent needs to be a Player to be selected as a judge. Ruling: FALSE Analysis: Rule 236/0 states: ------ The following are excluded from serving as Judges on a Request for Judgment: 1. the Plaintiff 2. Judges previously recused from the Request If these exclusions leave no Players eligible to serve as Judge, exclusions may be waived from highest-numbered to lowest until at least one Player becomes eligible. ------ Agents who are not players are not specifically exempted by requirements 1 or 2. Thus by 116/0, Joel could select, say, Tomjack's Mom. The last paragraph of the rule seems to imply that the only case in which a non-player could be selected would be if there were no eligible players. This is not made clear, however, and I suggest that we deal with the matter on a pragmatic basis until such time as the rule can be modified appropriately.