Re: [nimh-dev] nmh 2.0 discussion

[Tom Plagge <tplagge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Have you been keeping tabs on this?  I just got back from my  
honeymoon, so I've obviously been out of the loop on almost  
everything lately.  Are they settling on anything?

On Dec 22, 2005, at 10:39 AM, Joel Uckelman wrote:

> Now that nmh 1.2 has been released, there's been a whole bunch of  
> discussion
> on the nmh-workers list about what should be done for 2.0. In  
> particular,
> there's a discussion happening right now about whether to replace the
> mh-format syntax with something else. (I believe that Jon called it
> "baroquen".) Now might be a good time for us to chime in on this,  
> if we
> have any ideas.
>
> --
> J.
> _______________________________________________
> nimh-dev mailing list
> nimh-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/nimh-dev

_______________________________________________
nimh-dev mailing list
nimh-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/nimh-dev