[nimh-dev] Re: Thoughts on pmh

[Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thus spake Tom Plagge:
> 
> Since we're doing this in python, and since a lot of the objects are already
> written for us, we should be able to focus mostly on neat toys and features.
> But the first thing to do is get a "comp", "inc", and "scan" working.  I don'
> t
> use inc because procmail files my mail for me, but it's still obviously 
> important.  If we can get these up, which we ought to be able to do quickly,
> then we can start using it.

Once we get to the point of writing code, I'll nominate myself for writing 
inc, since I'm the one with the most requirements for it.
 
> I suggest we keep development closed to the three of us plus kortbein if he
> wants in, until the point where we're basically satisfied with where things 
> stand.  Then we can open source the bitch.
> 
> Thoughts?
> -t

I was going to suggest that we talk with Josh. My guess is that he won't 
want to do any coding---if he does, cool---but he's been using MH for more 
than a decade and so likely has some excellent suggestions.

-- 
J.


_______________________________________________
nimh-dev mailing list
nimh-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/nimh-dev