Joel Uckelman on Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:34:39 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [hosers-talk] greylisting |
Thus spake Joshua: > > Joel Uckelman sez: > >I've been thinking about setting up greylisting on charybdis. What that > >means is that a database of remote email servers would be kept, and only > >mail from known servers would be delivered immediately; all other mail > >servers would be asked to try again later, and then any mail servers which > >actually try again are added to the database. This is pretty effective > >against spam because usually legitimate mail servers make a second attempt > >to deliver (a few minutes to an hour later, usually), while spammers tend > >not to try again with the same message. > > > >So, would it bother anyone if I set up greylisting on charybdis? (This is > >likely to affect your real mail only if you routinely receive mail from > >people who have never contacted you before which needs to be acted upon > >within a few minutes of it being sent.) > > what's the downside? some legitimate mail will be delivered more > slowly; anything else? would any mail never be delivered? or would > that only happen in cases where a legitimate sender for some reason > never tried again, or got through again? The response code that a greylisted server would see indicates temporary unavailability; the relevant RFC requires that compliant mail servers try to deliver again. Any mail server which doesn't try again is Broken. I know of none in use today which behave like this, so the chances of lost mail are nil. > assuming there are no big problems with it i'm fine with it. i get > a lot of my mail through my school account, filtered to a gmail account, > and a bit more straight to gmail. i still get legitimate mail at ellipsis > but i get so much spam not caught by bogofilter or whatever we're using > that i usually spend a lot more time deleting missed spam than reading > the little real mail i get. I don't understand why bogofilter works near-optimally for me, but not for anyone else. Have you been training it on misclassified mail? -- J. _______________________________________________ hosers-talk mailing list hosers-talk@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/hosers-talk