Jon Stewart on 19 Nov 2003 05:47:29 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [hosers-talk] script-fu for trash |
> There already is at least one encrypted file system that Linux can handle, > thought I don't remember the name of it right now. A quick google reveals that the "standard" way to do it is the loopback encryption filesystem. You have a regular filesystem which contains an encrypted file which is mounted over loopback. SecurityFocus says it's vulnerable to a replay attack, though no exploits are known and this would be difficult; nonetheless, it's a design flaw. I'm not particularly crazy about the idea because it seems like a really lazy way to support an encrypted fs. You've gotta' be taking a pretty decent performance hit. OTOH, it does sound simple enough to be reliable. And, man, I am lazy... Jon -- Jon Stewart Advanced Los Angeles C++ stew1@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.alacpp.org _______________________________________________ hosers-talk mailing list hosers-talk@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/hosers-talk