Joel Uckelman on Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:17:44 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [game-lang] review of GDL |
Thus spake Marc Lanctot: > > I'm not an expert here, as I'm sure you can tell. So I can't comment on > much about the logic. I agree with Joel's points and observations. I > always expected a logical game description language to be more like the > situation calculus** with built-in high-level abstract board game > concepts and stochastic events. > > **http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Situation_calculus > Incidentally, one of the people whose work is cited on that page, Krzysztof Apt, was my promotor for my PhD, but we've never talked about the situation calculus before. Maybe I should go across the street to see him sometime this week. :) -- J. _______________________________________________ game-lang mailing list game-lang@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/game-lang