| Bill Jaffe on Thu, 22 May 2008 01:36:59 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [eia] standstill - a modest suggestion... |
In several of the games I'm in, a designated person sets deadlines. Maybe it's time we started doing so. Bill Jaffe bigbillthecollector@xxxxxxxxx Wargaming - EIA, 18xx, and more -----Original Message----- From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James Helle Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 10:58 PM To: public list for an Empires in Arms game Subject: [eia] standstill Is there a *lot* of diplomacy going on? I don't understand why we're not moving at all when there is nobody at war except France and GB (and they aren't fighting). With five out of seven major powers at peace we should get a game month in each week, at least, since most orders simply read "all corps hold and auto forage". Even if time is an issue it doesn't take much time to write that. _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia