J.J. Young on Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:46:40 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] repatriation |
I also thought we were using limited access. I recall I had opined that the rules were broken, but that I lost the argument. -JJY ----- Original Message ----- From: "MICHAEL P GORMAN" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxx> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 6:12 PM Subject: Re: [eia] repatriation >I thought we were using limited access after peace > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Monday, June 25, 2007 3:59 pm > Subject: [eia] repatriation > To: eia@xxxxxxxxxxx > > >> I believe there are French, Russian, and Austrian corps and garrisons >> to >> be repatriated as a result of the peace? (I seem to recall that I didn't >> win the argument last time about using the optional rule which cancels >> repatriation.) >> >> -- >> J. >> _______________________________________________ >> eia mailing list >> eia@xxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia >> > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia