Re: [eia] Paris results

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ah, I had the flanking forces and the pinning forces mixed up !  I'm sure
your analysis of the battle is correct, then.  Sorry for my confusion.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: [eia] Paris results


> At 10:45 PM 11/30/2006, you wrote:
>
> >For escalated assualt vs. Outflank, aren't you on 3-3 in round 1, a
French
> >roll of 5+1 = 6 on 3-3 means Davout inflicts -2.8 morale and 15% of 28 =
4
> >factors (3 British I - all there was in the pinning force, and 1 Russian
I).
> >Wellington rolls 4+1 = 5 on 3-1 and inflicts 10% of  9 = -1 M and -1.1
> >morale on the French.
> >
> >In round 2, the Coalition rolls 2+1 = 3 on 5-4 and inflicts 15% of
> >(5 pinning + 11 * 2 = 27), which comes to 4 casualties, one of which must
be
> >the Cav factor since the -2.4 morale loss is just _barely_ enough to
break
> >Davout in round 2.  However, the French roll 2+1 = 3 on 4-1 and inflict
10%
> >of 27 = 3 casualties on the Coalition army and -0.7 morale.
> >
> >Pursuit is unsuccessful.  Total French losses are -1 M, -3 I, -1 C, and
> >total Coalition losses are -5 British I (removing the British IV corps)
> >and -2 Russian I.  Davout retreats to Soissons.  -1 PP for France, +1 PP
> >each for Britain and Russia.
> >
> >This distribution of losses is slightly different from Mike's tally.
6/20
> >of 7 Coalition losses comes to 2 Russian casualties.
>
> Double checked the escrow and all first round losses were from the British
> 1st corps as it was the only force on the battlefield.  So all four factor
> had to be British infantry and could not be from the 4th corps.  As the
> second round losses caused only 2 British losses, the 4th corps must still
> be on the board as the most it could have lost was two of its three
factors
> and Russia would only lose one factor as it was only eligible for losses
> when three factors were inflicted and it represented only 6 of 16 factors
> at the time.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia