Re: [eia] Paris results

[Michael Gorman <mpgorman@xxxxxxxx>]

At 10:45 PM 11/30/2006, you wrote:

>For escalated assualt vs. Outflank, aren't you on 3-3 in round 1, a French
>roll of 5+1 = 6 on 3-3 means Davout inflicts -2.8 morale and 15% of 28 = 4
>factors (3 British I - all there was in the pinning force, and 1 Russian I).
>Wellington rolls 4+1 = 5 on 3-1 and inflicts 10% of  9 = -1 M and -1.1
>morale on the French.
>
>In round 2, the Coalition rolls 2+1 = 3 on 5-4 and inflicts 15% of
>(5 pinning + 11 * 2 = 27), which comes to 4 casualties, one of which must be
>the Cav factor since the -2.4 morale loss is just _barely_ enough to break
>Davout in round 2.  However, the French roll 2+1 = 3 on 4-1 and inflict 10%
>of 27 = 3 casualties on the Coalition army and -0.7 morale.
>
>Pursuit is unsuccessful.  Total French losses are -1 M, -3 I, -1 C, and
>total Coalition losses are -5 British I (removing the British IV corps)
>and -2 Russian I.  Davout retreats to Soissons.  -1 PP for France, +1 PP
>each for Britain and Russia.
>
>This distribution of losses is slightly different from Mike's tally.  6/20
>of 7 Coalition losses comes to 2 Russian casualties.
>
>-JJY
I thought the Russian corps was in the flanking force and thus ineligible 
for losses in round 1

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia