Re: [eia] French Land Phase

[Michael Gorman <mpgorman@xxxxxxxx>]

At 05:20 PM 9/25/2006, you wrote:
>Thus spake Michael Gorman:
> > At 10:43 AM 9/24/2006, you wrote:
> > >Sorry, had I realized that, Mack's I corps could have dropped a factor 
> there
> > >to garrison the depot.
> >
> > I guess I should've read this whole discussion earlier.  I had expected
> > things to go how Bill did, that since he had combined movement the Turks
> > could garrison the depot.  Since they can't I'd end up eating the depot 
> for
> > the French corps which would save them a factor and leave one cav factor
> > left alive in the Naples corps unless we pull an Austrian factor back to
> > garrison it.
> >
>
>For the record, all three of us expected my garrison to be holding the depot.
>Every once in a while, I'm still surprised by something in the rules...

So, are we going to let Bill drop a garrison back there then?  I have no 
real problem with it since it seems everyone involved thought it was 
unnecessary but it was.  I hadn't expected to be able to eat the depot when 
I planned the move so it's not like I wrote my movement orders around it.

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia