Re: [eia] 1-1 table, no adds

Michael Gorman on Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:49:27 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] 1-1 table, no adds

To: public list for an Empires in Arms game <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [eia] 1-1 table, no adds
From: Michael Gorman <mpgorman@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:47:49 -0500
In-reply-to: <045801c6bcac$730c2390$6401a8c0@acerc6bac00326>
References: <mailbox-28392-1155234915-925642@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <045801c6bcac$730c2390$6401a8c0@acerc6bac00326>

At 01:40 PM 8/10/2006, you wrote:
>I guess this falls under can't win them all.
>
>Bill Jaffe
>Wargaming since Tactics (1958), and playing 18xx since 1829
>billj@xxxxxxxxxxx

Although in a game thus far typified by mediocre to bad rolls for everyone, 
these last two battles have been spectacular.

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

References:
- [eia] 1-1 table, no adds
  - From: Dice server
- Re: [eia] 1-1 table, no adds
  - From: Bill Jaffe

Prev by Date: [eia] French sieges
Next by Date: Re: [eia] Pursuit after Strasbourg
Previous by thread: Re: [eia] 1-1 table, no adds
Next by thread: Re: [eia] 1-1 table, no adds
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread