Re: [eia] Austria land move, July 1806, part I - need French decision before moving any more...

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>]

    I would vote in favor of JJ's proposed house rule.  But I do recall that 
in the past, someone sent orders and then continued moving when he learned 
that a depot garrison had retired.  So there is precedent for following the 
rules as written, despite the additional emails required.

kdh

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 7:17 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] Austria land move, July 1806,part I - need French 
decision before moving any more...


> Thus spake "J.J. Young":
>> I believe the house rule, to avoid too many emails needed back and forth, 
>> is
>> that the attacking corps must stop its movement in the area and declare 
>> an
>> attack before the depot garrison must choose whether to fight or withdraw
>> into a city.  Is this right, everyone ?
>>
>> -JJY
>
> I was not under that impression---the rules say that it's possible to
> press on if the defenders retire, it's just that we've seldom had a
> situation where the phasing player wanted to do that.
>
> -- 
> J.
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia 

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia