Re: [eia] [escrow] July 1806 Political Orders

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

So the French army can leave Prussia to invade Austria, march to Linz, say,
seven spaces from Paris, then march back through Prussia to attack Russia a
year later.  And then return through Prussian territory a year after that to
attack Austria again.  As long as they never return to French territory, the
four French corps that entered Prussia have access through Prussia forever
and ever, amen.

This is a broken rule.

I'll play the game that way, but this is a broken rule.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 11:48 AM
Subject: Re: [eia] [escrow] July 1806 Political Orders


>     "Romping around", as JJ puts it, may be necessary to a) pick up a
> garrison or b) fight an enemy who is still harrying you despite your loss
of
> voluntary access.  So, as I stated before, the only conditions on movement
> should be those that existed prior to the revoking of access (i.e. none).
>
> kdh
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 11:41 AM
> Subject: Re: [eia] [escrow] July 1806 Political Orders
>
>
> > There has to be some restriction on the movements of forces which no
> > longer
> > have access to territory; romping around and being able to change
> > direction
> > doesn't seem to make sense.  But using "east" or "north" as the
criterion
> > seems very arbitrary.  Perhaps province boundaries are the way to
measure
> > it
> > ?  Once a corps enters a province closer to the original entry point, it
> > cannot return into provinces further away ?
> >
> > -JJY
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 10:36 AM
> > Subject: Re: [eia] [escrow] July 1806 Political Orders
> >
> >
> >> Thus spake Michael Gorman:
> >> > At 07:51 AM 7/25/2006, you wrote:
> >> > >The relevant question tough is whether the same route means the same
> > route,
> >> > >or can you use the previous unlimited access to return via Silesia,
> >> > >for
> >> > >example.
> >> >
> >> > I would say yes I can.  Since the access agreement he entered under
was
> >> > unrestricted, he is unrestricted in his route back.  But as i said
> > before I
> >> > think the new restriction follows along behind him closing off his
> > ability
> >> > to turn back east until he's moving around Prussian spaces he still
has
> >> > access to.  I'd also say if he headed south into Silesia he'd be
unable
> > to
> >> > turn north west into Posen as once he's in Silesia he has clear
ability
> > to
> >> > return home through Prussia via spaces he has access to under the new
> >> > agreement.
> >>
> >> If the original access agreement applies to each corps until it leaves
> >> Prussia, then I don't see why any corps would be unable to backtrack,
or
> >> why you couldn't continue using the depots you already have.
> >>
> >> --
> >> J.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> eia mailing list
> >> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> >> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia