Re: [eia] updated map

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

OK, since the area N of Warsaw was not available to the cossack I had held
there this turn, that cossack will instead move to Kustrin and destroy the
depot there.

As to the other question, as far as I know a depot can be eaten or converted
even if it's not presently part of a supply chain.  Although to be
converted, it must then be part of a valid supply chain for the converting
power.  Here's the rule I'm referencing:

7.3.6.1 UNGARRISONED DEPOT AREA: If during movement a corps, cossack,
freikorps or guerilla moves into an area containing an ungarrisoned enemy
depot, it may elect to destroy the depot. If it does destroy the depot and
ends its movement in that area, then having destroyed the depot counts as
having successfully foraged for supply (with no loss) for that one corps
counter. An alternative to destroying a depot is to convert (remove the
enemy depot and replace it with one of the entering power's depots-there is
no money cost for this conversion) it to a friendly depot if that would make
it a supply source or an extension of a friendly valid supply chain (see
7.2.3).

-JJY
----- Original Message -----
From: <MALabbett@xxxxxxx>
To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] updated map


> I don't want to risk the forage roll so I will move to the forest square
> north of Warsaw and pay $1. I will also pick up the two militia at the
depot on
> the way.
>
> As a hypothetical, as that depot has no forage in it due to cossack
> activity, will it still be lootable by opposition forces next turn?
>
> Cheers
>
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia