Re: [eia] British Land Phase-February 1806

["James Helle" <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

You're right.  I was thinking that combining movement with Prussia forced
France to move on Prussia's turn which, after double checking, I see is
still before mine.  Either way I jumped the gun.

P.S. You know, sitting around with all this time on my hands leaves me
chomping at the bit.

-----Original Message-----
From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 5:54 AM
To: public list for an Empires in Arms game
Subject: Re: [eia] British Land Phase-February 1806


Couldn't the French choose to move before Britain ?

-JJY

Quoting James Helle <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> We know Eugene is hoping to see some real action.  And not wanting to
> disappoint, here goes.
>
> Depot Removal:  none
> Depot Creation: Edinburgh ($1)
>
> 1 infantry at Birmingham --> Edinburgh & absorbs 1 infantry, leaving no
> garrison ($1)
> 1 infantry at Birmingham (w/ Wellington) --> Portsmouth  ($2)
> 1 infantry at London --> Portsmouth  ($2)
> 1 infantry SE of London --> London & absorbs 6 infantry, leaving no
garrison
> (F7-)
>
> Total cost= $6
>
> Mike, does the force at Portsmouth retire or fight?
>
> P.S.  At this point there are 4 British corps on the board and no British
> garrisons anywhere.
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia