Joel Uckelman on Sat, 20 May 2006 15:28:57 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] Birmingham results |
Thus spake "J.J. Young": > Hmm. Depot garrisons also prevent a retreating force from staying in an > area, so the shortest retreat path of (Birmingham ---> London ---> SE of > London ---> blocked crossing arrow = no retreat possible) may be correct. I think that the French retreat to Portsmouth: The requirement in 7.5.2.10.3.1 is that retreates be into an adjacent land area closest to the nearest depot of the nationality being retreated. The Dover area isn't adjacent to itself, so it doesn't count. Lille is disqualified by 7.5.2.10.3.4 because it's adjacent across an arrow, and London is disqualified by 7.5.2.10.3.5 because the French retreated through it prior to arriving at Dover. Hence the only remaining adjacent are is Portsmouth. The salient fact here is that 7.5.2.10.3.1 does not require that the the French are always cutting the distance to a depot with every step, just that the next move is into the closest of the adjacent areas. The only places on the map where you can capture a force due to lack of retreat options are 3-area or smaller islands, where it's practical to fill *all* of the areas. -- J. _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia