jjy on Tue, 2 May 2006 11:06:33 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] French Land Phase |
So you're saying that this situation is an exception to the rule because the leader never actually moved; if he had moved, he would have to move with a corps he was stacked with at the beginning of the land phase. OK, I can see that. -JJY Quoting Michael Gorman <mpgorman@xxxxxxxx>: > At 04:10 AM 5/2/2006, you wrote: > > > 10.6.2: Leaders may move by spending their entire movement with a corps > > > (fleet for NELSON) with which they began the Land or Naval Movement > Step. > > > >This seems clear to me. You look at the map at the start of your land > >phase, and the leader must stay with one of the corps he is stacked with at > >that time. I think that if we were supposed to consider the corps "with > >which the leader began its movement" then 10.6.2 would say so. What it > does > >say seems different and explicit. > > > >-JJY > I would say the key part you are missing is the leader MAY move. My leader > did not move. If it said he must move with a corps he began the land phase > with, I could see your reading of it, but otherwise it looks to me to say > that if the leader moves, it must be with a corps he began the land phase > with, but if he does not move, then it doesn't matter which corps he ends > the turn with. > > > > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia