James Helle on Tue, 2 May 2006 08:42:37 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] French Land Phase |
This caught me by surprise too, but seems perfectly legal within the wording of the rules. I am inclined to believe 10.6.2 doesn't apply because Soult didn't move and 10.6 was not violated because Soult was never "unstacked". -----Original Message----- From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of J.J. Young Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 2:11 AM To: public list for an Empires in Arms game Subject: Re: [eia] French Land Phase > 10.6.2: Leaders may move by spending their entire movement with a corps > (fleet for NELSON) with which they began the Land or Naval Movement Step. This seems clear to me. You look at the map at the start of your land phase, and the leader must stay with one of the corps he is stacked with at that time. I think that if we were supposed to consider the corps "with which the leader began its movement" then 10.6.2 would say so. What it does say seems different and explicit. -JJY _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia