James Helle on Sun, 23 Apr 2006 22:21:36 -0400 (EDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] London results |
Yes, there are no garrison factors in London at this point. -----Original Message----- From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of J.J. Young Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 6:57 PM To: public list for an Empires in Arms game Subject: Re: [eia] London results I assumed that GB would want to take its casualties from the garrison first. Was a French corps removed as a result of the battle ? -JJY ----- Original Message ----- From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 9:15 PM Subject: Re: [eia] London results > Great Britain gains +1 PP, since there was a corps inside London. > > -JJY > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "James Helle" <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 8:35 PM > Subject: [eia] London results > > > > Apparently Bill and Mike sent their emails as I was sending mine. So it > > seems we agree on 7 factors for each side. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > eia mailing list > > eia@xxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia