RE: [eia] Garrison question

["William Jaffe" <billj6203@xxxxxxxxx>]

I think we should allow a change in destination, if the Brit/Russian so
desires...

Bill Jaffe
Playing Wargames since 1958, and 18xx since 1829...
billj6203@xxxxxxxxx

-----Original Message-----
From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 12:58 PM
To: public list for an Empires in Arms game
Subject: Re: [eia] Garrison question

Crap.  I guess I'm quite the moron.

-JJY

Quoting jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx:

> I was just reading those things myself, and I agree that the city would
> remain 
> unoccupied until the Russian land phase.
> 
> -JJY
> 
> Quoting Michael Gorman <mpgorman@xxxxxxxx>:
> 
> > The corps on board the fleets that just retreated to New Castle have not

> > unloaded from the transports yet, do they count as a garrison for
purposes
> 
> > of manning the city guns or is the city still considered ungarrisoned
until
> 
> > they are able to debark in the Russian Land Phase?
> > 
> > Similarly, should a ground force arrive at New Castle, would the corps
in 
> > the transports prevent the arriving force from occupying the city and 
> > forcing the fleets to depart?
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia