Re: [eia] Spain's resignation

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

As opposed to the UMP rules, I would prefer the 14.2.2 procedure another
round of bidding, with the winner running Spain as well as the country he's
got now.  This might require a bit of tweaking of the setup, but not a total
restart.

However, I'm willing to keep playing (or rather, start playing) regardless
of how we decide to do it.  But it's a legitimate question whether some
players consider this whole project a bust.  What does everyone think ?

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "James Helle" <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 8:03 PM
Subject: [eia] Spain's resignation


> I'm not sure what Jayson is so upset about.  Even if the group hadn't
> allowed him to alter his fleet placement, (which I think was a harmless
> concession seeing as how we've all probably already worked out who's going
> to conquer what), he could have declared these wars in February.
>
> However, one thing I am sure of is that I am not interested in re-inviting
> Jayson back to the group (if he changes his mind) as this is an indication
> of what we have to look forward to any time he doesn't get his way.
>
> I, for one, am willing to use the UMP rules until we find another player.
I
> have zero interest in starting over or in delaying this game any longer.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia