Re: [eia] EIA flowchart

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I still feel that everyone should have the same access conditions through
the naval and land phases, without worrying about changes during the course
of those phases.  Otherwise, do we need to consult each player at every
stage to check if they want to change access ?  What if you want to change
access before someone else takes their turn, but you don't have access to a
computer before they move ?  It just sounds like chaos to me.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] EIA flowchart


> Thus spake Michael Gorman:
> > I would like to drop some of our house rules.
> >
> > Access.
> > I would like us to follow the rules version of access where it is
> > determined dynamically.  I was and still am opposed to forcing it into
the
> > political phase for pretty much no reason that I was ever able to
discern
> > beyond the desire to escrow everything that could be escrowed.
>
> I agree.
>
> > Limited Access after wars.
> > Why don't we finally bite the bullet and use it?  I know some of you
didn't
> > like that it gave unlimited access for a time, but the repatriation
method
> > just bugs me and I would much rather use the limited access rules.
>
> I agree. I do not like the idea that forces simply teleport home at the
end
> of a war.
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia