Re: [eia] losing players

[Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thus spake "Kyle H":
> > If the British are going for a solo victory, say,
> 
> But why should we say this?  There is no incentive in the game that I am
> aware of to win and prevent others from doing the same.  You either win the
> game or you lose it.  As far as I know, there are no gradations of victory.
> So what incentive would any power have to prevent other powers from winning?
> Schadenfreude?  You must have a very low opinion of us...
> 
> kdh

My example has nothing at all to do with the people who are playing right 
now. I think that there is something qualitatively different about a solo 
win, and if you're shooting for that you'll be doing something different 
than if you're not. My example doesn't turn on that point, however; it 
still makes sense in the context of aiming for a shared win.

-- 
J.


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia