James Helle on Fri, 22 Jul 2005 15:48:05 -0500 (CDT)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: [eia] no word regarding seventh player


I agree with Kyle 100% that we need to stop starting over.  I will cast my
vote now for continuing our current game.  I won't say that I'll not play
another EiA game because I enjoy it too much, but _if_ we start over (by
majority vote?) I would demand that an agreed upon method for continuing
through this type of situation in the future be put in place.  I agree with
JJ that one player running two MPs is preferable to using the UMP rules.  So
I say let's continue on.

-----Original Message-----
From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
Joel Uckelman
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 10:18 AM
To: public list for an Empires in Arms game
Subject: Re: [eia] no word regarding seventh player


Thus spake MALabbett@xxxxxxx:
> Gentlemen
>
> I hope you guys do not mind me introducing myself. My name is Mark Labbett
> and I have been watching this game over the last 15 months or so. I am
based
> in
>  the UK.
>
> I would be happy to take over as your seventh player, either in the
current
> game or if you wish to start afresh. My EIA experience is limited (a
couple o
> f
>  games only) but I have been playing AH games for over 20 years.
>
> Yours faithfully

Hi,

I knew there was at least one lurker on the list; it's good to finally meet
you.

As for everyone else: We should decide what we're doing. Maybe a vote would
be in order:

( ) Continue.
( ) Restart.

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia