James Helle on Fri, 22 Jul 2005 15:48:05 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
RE: [eia] no word regarding seventh player |
I agree with Kyle 100% that we need to stop starting over. I will cast my vote now for continuing our current game. I won't say that I'll not play another EiA game because I enjoy it too much, but _if_ we start over (by majority vote?) I would demand that an agreed upon method for continuing through this type of situation in the future be put in place. I agree with JJ that one player running two MPs is preferable to using the UMP rules. So I say let's continue on. -----Original Message----- From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Joel Uckelman Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 10:18 AM To: public list for an Empires in Arms game Subject: Re: [eia] no word regarding seventh player Thus spake MALabbett@xxxxxxx: > Gentlemen > > I hope you guys do not mind me introducing myself. My name is Mark Labbett > and I have been watching this game over the last 15 months or so. I am based > in > the UK. > > I would be happy to take over as your seventh player, either in the current > game or if you wish to start afresh. My EIA experience is limited (a couple o > f > games only) but I have been playing AH games for over 20 years. > > Yours faithfully Hi, I knew there was at least one lurker on the list; it's good to finally meet you. As for everyone else: We should decide what we're doing. Maybe a vote would be in order: ( ) Continue. ( ) Restart. _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia