Re: [eia] no word regarding seventh player

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>]

    I have asked my dad if he'd be interested in playing.  He's an amateur
history buff who has gamed with the group down here in Columbus successfully
before.  He seemed to have a positive reaction to the idea when I mentioned
it.  We (here in Columbus) should probably try to arrange a time to run a
scenario with him to give him a sense of what the game is like.

kdh

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 11:48 PM
Subject: [eia] no word regarding seventh player


There's still no response to my email from Fred, so this afternoon I left a
voice mail message to get in touch.  If there's no response soon to this,
then we'll have to either think of another prospect or consider how to
handle playing with six players.  (I still favor having one player control
two countries, rather than the UMP rules.)

Speaking of which, I was browsing the setup for the Grand Campaign game, and
it's Spain, not Turkey, which is recommended to be dropped in a 6-player
game.  Too bad, in my opinion.

-JJY
_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia