James Helle on Thu, 21 Jul 2005 09:48:39 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
RE: [eia] impasse |
One way would be to put a cap on the bidding process. I think a cap of "20" ("25" max) would be high enough, with ties resolved by unmodified die rolls per 14.2.1.2. It's beginning to sound like there is a consensus for starting over, isn't it? I would be interested in hearing from Mike and Sterling, too. -----Original Message----- From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Kyle H Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 6:04 AM To: public list for an Empires in Arms game Subject: Re: [eia] impasse > I thought that bidding was too high immediately after seeing the results, > honestly. > I agree. And that's why I ended up with Turkey. :-) The trouble is: how do you stop someone from paying too much for something they really want? I don't see how you can prevent people from bidding foolishly if they want to. kdh _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia