Re: [eia] Russian Land Phase, May 1807

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

No, the whole point is that when you use forcible access, the offended party
has the option to ignore enforced peace and declare war.  This is similar to
the option of attacking a neutral fleet carrying enemy troops; you can
choose to declare war on the carrying fleet's major power, even if enforced
peace applies.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 10:16 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] Russian Land Phase, May 1807


> Thus spake "J.J. Young":
> > My check of the archives seemed to indicate that we are using forcible
> > access (but not limited access after formal peace treaties).  We had
decided
> > that when forcible access is used, this affords the offended power a
> > (temporary) opportunity to declare war on the offender, regardless of
> > enforced peace.  This is all in the "issues to be addressed" thread from
> > March, 2004.
> >
> > So with this in mind, does Russia still want to move the cossacks
through
> > and risk a Turkish DOW ?  If so, does Turkey wish to take advantage of
the
> > opportunity ?
>
> I wish to proceed, because Turkey is prohibited from declaring war on
> Russia.
>
> --
> J.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia