James Helle on Wed, 29 Jun 2005 19:45:57 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
RE: FW: [eia] Assault at Stettin |
Ahh. I knew that, sieges tend to favor the defenders. -----Original Message----- From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Joel Uckelman Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 5:33 PM To: public list for an Empires in Arms game Subject: Re: FW: [eia] Assault at Stettin Thus spake "James Helle": > What am I missing here? Why are there no second round rolls? Mike didn't break my cossack in the first round, and my rolls (which preceded Mike's) broke the besiegers in the second. Both sides are too small to inflict casualties, and it makes no difference in a siege if the defenders break once the attackers have, so there's no reason for Mike to roll for the second round. -- J. _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia