Re: [eia] Austrian land phase, Feb '07

[Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thus spake Michael Gorman:
> At 09:16 AM 5/17/2005, you wrote:
> >Thus spake Michael Gorman:
> > >
> > > >1I Posen -- drop 1M --> Wittenburg ($1)
> > >
> > >
> > > It's not possible for this corps to have more than 1m factor in it.
> > >
> > > Austria generated 29 manpower in December and deployed two corp in
> > > January.  One corps had 12 militia, 24 manpower, and fought at
> > > Breslau.  The other corps dropped one factor at Glogau and now is droppin
> g
> > > one at Posen, 4 manpower.  That's all the factors that could have been
> > > placed in January leaving no factors for it to move to Wittenburg with.
> >
> >Nate says:
> >
> >"If it thinks messages from the list are spam would it reject them, or
> >would it just take them in and they would disappear into the ether?  I'm
> >wondering if I didn't accidentally mark EiA messages as spam, but I
> >didn't have time to check last night.
> >
> >What do you think about the new orders?  I'd failed to note in my log
> >that I'd dropped that factor off in Glogau last turn and that I only had
> >one at Posen."
> >
> >As a group, we seem unusually prone to computer problems. Or computers are
> >prone to problems. One of those.
> >
> >In the interests of getting going again, I think I can say that Nate will
> >resolve the problem by not placing a garrison at Posen.
> Okay.  This will mean that Austrian will not conquer the Posen province.

Oh. I hadn't noticed that. I shouldn't have spoken for Nate, then. We'll see what he says this evening.


-- 
J.


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia