Nate Ellefson on Sun, 14 Nov 2004 12:14:04 -0600 (CST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
RE: [eia] conquests |
I'll be very surprised if JJ isn't correct on this point. :) > -----Original Message----- > From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of J.J. Young > Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 11:54 AM > To: public list for an Empires in Arms game > Subject: Re: [eia] conquests > > > But the Bavaria corps was already in occupation of Mainz at > the beginning of the month, so the capital has been under > uninterrupted occupation all the way through April. > > -JJY > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx> > To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 12:46 PM > Subject: Re: [eia] conquests > > > > Thus spake "Kyle H": > > > Since there is nothing left that can affect conquests > in Western > Europe, > > > Britain will conquer Tuscany at the end of the turn (+1 GB, -1 > > > France) > and > > > Austria will conquer Berg, Lombardy, Wurttemburg, and > Palatinate (+4 > > > Austria, -4 France). > > > > Austria can't conquer Palatinate in April, since the > garrison at Mainz > > was put there only this month. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > eia mailing list > > eia@xxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia