Nate Ellefson on Sun, 14 Nov 2004 12:14:04 -0600 (CST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: [eia] conquests


I'll be very surprised if JJ isn't correct on this point. :)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of J.J. Young
> Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 11:54 AM
> To: public list for an Empires in Arms game
> Subject: Re: [eia] conquests 
> 
> 
> But the Bavaria corps was already in occupation of Mainz at 
> the beginning of the month, so the capital has been under 
> uninterrupted occupation all the way through April.
> 
> -JJY
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 12:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [eia] conquests
> 
> 
> > Thus spake "Kyle H":
> > >     Since there is nothing left that can affect conquests 
> in Western
> Europe,
> > > Britain will conquer Tuscany at the end of the turn (+1 GB, -1 
> > > France)
> and
> > > Austria will conquer Berg, Lombardy, Wurttemburg, and 
> Palatinate (+4 
> > > Austria, -4 France).
> >
> > Austria can't conquer Palatinate in April, since the 
> garrison at Mainz 
> > was put there only this month.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> 

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia