Michael Gorman on Fri, 15 Oct 2004 17:37:44 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] next land phase |
At 05:03 PM 10/15/2004, you wrote:
The rule does say complete months. So I would read that as a month being counted at the same phase as the leader was wounded. The land phase for everyone but Nelson. So, Hohenloe would return in May, but not until the land phase when it would be too late to place him. So June would be the first turn he could be placed on the map.1.) Hohenloe should be out immediately, I'm sure. 2.) My opinion is that we should count his time wounded in reinforcement phases that he cannot be deployed. In this case, a 3-month sitout would mean Hohenloe cannot be deployed in March, April, or May, but is available again in June. But I don't know of any specific rule to back up this opinion. -JJY
Mike _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia