Re: [eia] just checking

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Another case would be a city on the receiving end which is not a supply
source, such as an enemy city which you have occupied.  The fleet would have
to be at the sending end for sea supply to connect.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 1:00 AM
Subject: Re: [eia] just checking


> Thus spake Michael Gorman:
> >
> > >
> > >The only rub I see is 5.2.2.2.3.1, which requires that the supply chain
> > >"start" in the home nation in order to send reinforcements. I take it
from
> > >7.4.3.1 that the supply is supposed to flow from the end with the
fleet, so
> > >I think that means you would need a fleet in Britain or Ireland to do
this.
> > That is interesting.  So 7.4.3.1 would indicate that the fleet must
always
> > be at the originating end.  Doesn't matter in Britain's case where both
> > ends of the Naples supply are lines are valid sources for supply
purposes,
> > but it does mean you can't pull a fleet into a besieged city and build a
> > depot there, the fleet has to be at the unbesieged end.
> >
> > Mike
>
> Yeah, that seems to be the gist of this. That's not the way I'd thought it
worked previously. It's weird to note that it works the opposite way for
invasion supply; there's no need for a fleet at the source end, as far as I
can tell. (Cf. 7.4.4.1)
>
> --
> J.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia