Re: [eia] Turkish land phase, July '05

[Michael Gorman <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 05:02 PM 7/8/2004 -0400, you wrote:
> Barring the two of you working something out, my opinion is that both sets
> of original orders (including the typo) and the original forage rolls should
> stand.  I feel this way because a reasonable amount of time passed between
> Joel's orders and Kyle's orders, and because it has not been our custom to
> ask for changes after the game has moved on in a way that was affected by
> those changes.  Kyle could choose to be generous and allow both sides to
> redo their orders, but that would be up to him.
>
> Again, that's just my opinion (not trying to get anybody miffed; sorry if I
> did).
        Actually, it has been our custom to allow major changes after 
things have passed.  In the past it has been allowed to have some complete 
a turn, make their battle rolls and then rework their entire movement phase 
while keeping their same battle rolls.  Thus allowing them to commit forces 
knowing if they would win battles and what their forage losses would 
be.  The basis then was that clearly they intended to do things this way 
but had missent the orders.
        I would say this is a far smaller change than has been allowed in 
the past.

Mike


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia