Michael Gorman on Thu, 8 Jul 2004 16:43:24 -0500 (CDT)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] Turkish land phase, July '05

At 05:02 PM 7/8/2004 -0400, you wrote:
Barring the two of you working something out, my opinion is that both sets
of original orders (including the typo) and the original forage rolls should
stand.  I feel this way because a reasonable amount of time passed between
Joel's orders and Kyle's orders, and because it has not been our custom to
ask for changes after the game has moved on in a way that was affected by
those changes.  Kyle could choose to be generous and allow both sides to
redo their orders, but that would be up to him.

Again, that's just my opinion (not trying to get anybody miffed; sorry if I
Actually, it has been our custom to allow major changes after things have passed. In the past it has been allowed to have some complete a turn, make their battle rolls and then rework their entire movement phase while keeping their same battle rolls. Thus allowing them to commit forces knowing if they would win battles and what their forage losses would be. The basis then was that clearly they intended to do things this way but had missent the orders. I would say this is a far smaller change than has been allowed in the past.


eia mailing list