Kyle H on Wed, 7 Jul 2004 22:49:49 -0500 (CDT)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] Russian Land Phase (part I), July 1805


    Yes, this is correct.

kdh

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 10:40 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] Russian Land Phase (part I), July 1805


> Since St. Petersburg is blockaded, I don't think the depot at Athens can
be
> created, since there's no supply source.  Is this right ?
>
> -JJY
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 3:23 PM
> Subject: [eia] Russian Land Phase (part I), July 1805
>
>
> > Depot removal: W of Kiev
> > Depot creation: Abo, Athens, Erzurum, Minsk ($4)
> >
> > 3 cossacks at Odessa -> Ismail
> > 2 cossasks S of Odessa -> Ismail
> >
> > Does the garrison at Ismail burn the depot? retire into the city?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia