D Mount on Sat, 3 Jul 2004 14:01:09 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] obscure rules questions |
I agree with Jim on both of these issues. -D James Helle <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 1) Yes, I believe that since British corps are considered friendly for this purpose that a minor country corps could be placed outside its' home nation. However, it would have to have a supply source located in its' home nation (5.2.2.2.3.1) and be able to trace supply to its destination using sea supply, but not invasion supply (5.2.2.2.3.4). That is, unless someone else finds a relevant rule that I didn't find that states this cannot be done. 2) No, I do not believe this is legal. The rule refered to by JJ is only in effect if Naples and Sicily are controlled by two different major powers. Per 11.7, these are treated as one multi- district minor country. Even if conquered seperately, I believe they would revert to one minor country as soon as one major power gains control of both. JRH ----- Original Message ----- From: "J.J. Young" To: Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2004 10:40 AM Subject: [eia] obscure rules questions > 1.) Is it possible to place a new free state corps on the map overseas, with a corps of the major power that controls the free state (the obvious example would be placing a Swedish corps overseas with a British corps) ? > > I believe so, since rule 5.2.1.2 states, "Purchased empty corps counters may be placed in an unbesieged home nation city (or minor free state city for corps of that minor free state) or with any existing, unbesieged friendly corps." I believe that free state corps and corps of the power that controls them are considered "friendly" in the technical game sense, right ? > > If it is possible, how would I be required to place my depots and fleets to properly set up the supply line neccessary ? > > 2.) If I succeed in conquering the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies, am I allowed to make either Naples or Sicily a free state, while keeping the other part conquered ? > > Would it make any difference if I conquered Sicily first, and then Naples in a different month ? Rule 10.4.3.2 states (among other things) that "It is possible for one major power to conquer a secondary district (by controlling its capital) while another major power controls the major district.... When this happens ... the major district is considered a separate minor country from the secondary district until the secondary district satisfies the conditions of neutrality." > > So if I got control of Sicily, then Naples, _must_ I recombine them ? I'm not yet even sure that that's what I would choose to do, I'm just exploring my options. > > -JJY > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia