Re: [eia] Turkish land phase, April 1805

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>]

    You must have missed my email.  I stated that the Turkish corps at
Galatz *did* lay siege but did *not* make a breach attempt.

kdh

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: [eia] Turkish land phase, April 1805


> You know, according to my records the Russians did leave a 1 M garrison at
> Galatz.  I guess the Turkish corps there didn't choose to lay siege ?
>
> -JJY
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>
> To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 4:08 PM
> Subject: [eia] Turkish land phase, April 1805
>
>
> > Depot removal: none.
> > Depot creation: Ismael. ($1)
> >
> > Syria holds at Erzurum.  (F/auto)
> > 1I: Ruschuk => Galatz.  (F/3-)
> > 1C (w/Kushanz Ali): Ruschuk => Ismael.  (F/auto)
> > 1C: Ruschuk => Ismael.  (F/5-)
> > 2C: Ruschuk => Ismael.  (F/4-)
> > 4I (w/Pechlivan Khan): Ruschuk => Ismael.  ($2)
> > 1I: Ruschuk => S. of Ismael.  (F/5-)
> > 2I (w/Grand Vizier): Damascus => Acre.  ($2)
> >
> > Grand Total: $5.
> >
> > Forage rolls follow.  The leaderless Russians must decide whether to
fight
> or retire at Acre.
> >
> > kdh
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia