Re: [eia] access adjustments ?

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I don't see why those who go later in the reinforcement order should also
have an advantage in seeing previous countries' access changes.  Having
access be in the political escrow would be better.  I definitely vote
against Jim's proposal.

-JJY

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 11:30 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] access adjustments ?


>     Sure, that's fine by me, and it seems to solve everyone's problems.
>
> kdh
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "James Helle" <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "EiA" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 1:49 AM
> Subject: FW: [eia] access adjustments ?
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: James Helle [mailto:jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 8:50 PM
> > To: public list for an Empires in Arms game
> > Subject: RE: [eia] access adjustments ?
> >
> >
> > I agree that Kyle's solution is a very good one, (even though I still
hold
> > that access is a political action).  However, I would take his
suggestion
> > one step further and say that *all* access agreements should be
announced
> in
> > the reinforcement phase.  This eliminates the hassle of tracking when a
> > minor was acquired, allows everyone knowledge of access agreements in
> force
> > prior to moving in the land phase, prevents having to make multiple
> > declarations of access, and eliminates keeping track of the 24 hour time
> > period.  I feel this is the best solution.
> >
> > Jim
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of D
> > Mount
> > Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 9:39 AM
> > To: public list for an Empires in Arms game
> > Subject: Re: [eia] access adjustments ?
> >
> >
> > I believe that Kyle's solution is the best for our game.  Reinforcement
is
> > something that everyone gets an opportunity with.  I can see situation
> where
> > JJ's suggestion might run into some problems with people being out of
town
> > or having major situations they have to deal with lasting longer than 24
> > hours and they never get a chance to check their email.  Therefore, my
> vote
> > is for Kyle's proposal.
> >
> > -Danny
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia