Re: [eia] access adjustments ?

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Does Russia still wish to grant British-controlled forces access to Berg ?

-JJY

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 9:11 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] access adjustments ?


> In that case, Great Britain again grants unrestricted access to Baden,
> Hesse, Tuscany, and Wurttemburg for all forces controlled by Austria,
> Prussia, or Russia.
>
> -JJY
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>
> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 3:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [eia] access adjustments ?
>
>
> >     No, we are not playing with 12.8.  We dropped it towards the end of
> our
> > last game, and we specifically excluded it at the beginning of this
game.
> >
> > kdh
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 12:52 AM
> > Subject: Re: [eia] access adjustments ?
> >
> >
> > > > I believe we are playing with the option that voluntary access may
> only
> > be
> > > > given to allies so most of the access statements made can't be made.
> > >
> > > Come to think of it, I believe you're right.  Oh well.
> > >
> > > -JJY
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > eia mailing list
> > > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia