Re: [eia] access adjustments ?

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>]

    Once all minor countries are controlled, it won't be an issue.  So if it
is cumbersome, it won't be for long.

kdh

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] access adjustments ?


> Thus spake "Kyle H":
> >     I think that adjusting Voluntary Access in response to Minor Country
> > Control was justified in this particular instance because there was so
much
> > action with regard to Minor Countries being attacked.  But let's not
forget
> > that usually Voluntary Access decisions are made and sent in with the
> > Political Phase escrow.  (In the last game, a Voluntary Access amendment
was
> > rejected because it was not made at the proper time.)
> >     So I just want to make sure everyone is aware that we are making an
> > exception to the rule in this case, but we shouldn't expect to be able
to
> > make such Voluntary Access amendments all the time.
> >
> > kdh
>
> Here's my concern with this: Do I need to write conditional access orders
> for each minor I don't control, every month, just in case I end up
> controlling it? That seems overly cumbersome to me. Access agreements do
> occur after minor control is assigned.
>
> This never occurred to me as an issue last game, probably because I wasn't
> frequently attempting to control minors myself.
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia